Please do take the time to watch the video further down and then reply to the question even more further down:
Filed under Could it be art?
I’d call the whole spectacle vacuous. It’s like been presented with a dollop of sauce in a plate and then you discover that there is no need underneath.
But it’s art because it has great costumes 🙂
No MEAT underneath.
Either I am becoming senile or that was a Freudian slip.
I give each possibility a 50% chance of being the answer.
Heh… i’ll vote for Freud on this one.
Better than Hirst’s strokes… I mean brushstrokes.
The question never really is if something can be or can’t be considered as art.
The question itself is now questioned if it can be or can’t be considered as something.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.